1. Powerful Performance and Precise Handling: The maximum power acceleration takes only 5.8 seconds, with power output far exceeding competitors such as ID.4 X and Song PLUS EV. Equipped with a sport-tuned suspension and rear-wheel-drive layout, it balances high-speed stability and fine bump filtering capabilities, delivering a class-unique handling experience.
2. Exquisite Technology and Ritual Configuration: A 14.6-inch electric sliding smart screen and wireless fast charging provide a leading intelligent interactive experience. It also features detailed designs like intelligent B-pillar interaction, full of a sense of ritual.
3. Balanced Energy Efficiency: The 100km power consumption is 13.4kWh, better than ID.4 X and Tai 3, and close to Song PLUS EV. Silicon carbide technology provides support for efficient driving.

1. Limited Range and Charging Efficiency: The CLTC range is 420km, significantly lower than Song PLUS EV and Tai 3, resulting in obvious range anxiety for long-distance travel. Fast charging takes 0.5 hours, which is better than some competitors but not at the industry's top level.
2. Shortcomings in Space Practicality: With body dimensions of 4450x1836x1572mm, the rear legroom is relatively cramped. The luggage compartment capacity is not clearly marked, leading to insufficient loading convenience for families.
3. Room for Improvement in Intelligent Driving Details: The automatic parking system has low recognition accuracy for non-standard parking spaces. The lane departure assist tends to frequently intervene in the steering wheel. The high-speed energy consumption control has not fully utilized technical advantages, leaving room for improvement.

Vehicle Overview

Basic Information

Specifications

Maintenance Costs & Manufacturer Services

Subsidies & Policies

Competitor Comparison

1. Range and Energy Efficiency：CCLTC range is 420km, significantly lower than the Song PLUS EV and Tai 3, and only slightly better than the ID.4 X; 100km power consumption is 13.4kWh, with energy efficiency better than the ID.4 X and Tai 3, and comparable to the Song PLUS EV; overall range performance ranks in the middle and lower levels among the compared models.
2. Charging Performance：Fast charging time is 0.5 hours, slower than the Tai 3, on par with the Song PLUS EV, and better than the ID.4 X; overall charging efficiency is at a medium to high level.
3. Dynamic Performance：Maximum power is 200kW, and 0-100km/h acceleration time is 5.8 seconds, with power output far exceeding the Tai 3 (power not marked, positioned as an entry-level version), the Song PLUS EV (front-wheel drive, less performance-oriented), and the ID.4 X (rear-wheel drive, acceleration data not marked); sporty tuning makes it the only option among the four models that can meet the demand for driving pleasure, with power advantages that can be called a benchmark in its class.
4. Space Practicality：Body dimensions are 4450x1836x1572mm, significantly smaller than the other three models; luggage compartment capacity data is missing, but based on dimensions, its loading capacity may be weaker than the ID.4 X (484-1546L) and Song PLUS EV (574-1477L), and overall space performance is expected to be on par with competitors.
5. Technological Configurations：Equipped with reverse imaging and 360° panoramic imaging, on par with the ID.4 X and Song PLUS EV, but lacks transparent imaging function, slightly inferior to the Tai 3.
6. Comfort Configurations：Both front seats are electric, on par with the ID.4 X and Tai 3, and better than the Song PLUS EV which only has an electric driver's seat.There are 4 USB/Type-C ports in total (2 in the front row + 2 in the rear row), consistent with the other three models.

Actual Test Evaluation

1. Excellent high-speed range achievement rate among peers, with rapid acceleration (0-100km/h in 5.8 seconds), stable braking, and handling that balances comfort and bump filtering capability on unpaved roads.
2. The 14.6-inch sliding screen in the cockpit operates smoothly, the seats are thickly padded with strong support, and fast charging can replenish energy to 80% in 0.5 hours, effectively alleviating range anxiety.

1. The automatic parking has insufficient recognition accuracy for non-standard parking spaces; the in-vehicle system occasionally has issues such as welcome music restarting and automatic headlight memory failure.
2. The rear seat belt storage is inconvenient, the trunk tailgate has uneven gaps, and the frunk button is positioned low, requiring optimization in detailed design.

1. Under high-speed conditions with air conditioning on and an average speed of 99.6km/h, the ZEEKR X drove 350km on a full charge before the displayed range returned to zero. Its high-speed range performance is reliable, and the achievement rate is better than most peer models.
2. During the test, the ZEEKR X underwent challenges including -10℃ low temperature, 700℃ battery burning, and unpaved roads. The XTCS anti-slip system and 800V battery performed stably, meeting the standards for handling and safety in extreme environments.

Real-World Reviews

Positive Feedback

Powerful Performance

1. “Even in light rain and with only 34% battery left, it can still accelerate in 4 seconds—what more could you ask for?”
2. “The dual-motor power is great; the car drives really smoothly and responsive.”

Stylish Appearance

1. “The exterior is stylish and distinctive, with solid build quality that gives a strong sense of security.”
2. “Green exterior with green interior—both look perfect, like a little beetle. My wife decided to book it right after seeing it.”

Negative Feedback

Limited Storage Space

1. “The space is small, and the storage areas are unreasonably designed.”
2. “It's a very exquisite small car, but the storage space is a bit too small!”

Impractical Configurations

1. “The infotainment system has a lot of glitches—settings like lights and seat memory won't save, and there aren't many apps available.”
2. “The infotainment system is definitely at the bottom of the pile; we can only wait for gradual optimizations.”

References